Insurance Cases

Our representation of those clients who have been treated unfairly and in bad faith by their insurance carriers has resulted in millions of dollars in recovery to our clients. Whether our clients suffer a loss to their home, property or even life after a catastrophe or singular event, the insurance company’s obligation to treat its policyholders fairly and in good faith remains the single most important consideration. We have devoted our practice to ensuring those carriers who choose to forget this and instead elect to place their company’s financial interests above that of their policyholder pay a heavy price.

As of this date we either are or have been involved in litigation against the following insurance companies for allegations which included the carrier’s failure to deal fairly and in good faith.

AAA Fire & Casualty Insurance Company
Allstate Indemnity Company
Allstate Insurance Company
America First Insurance Company
American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida
American Farmers and Ranchers Mutual Insurance Company
American Mercury Insurance Company
American Modern Home Insurance Company
American National General Insurance Company
American National Insurance Company
American National Property and Casualty
American Summit Insurance Company
Central Mutual Insurance Company
Farmers Insurance Company
Foremost Insurance Company
Mercury Insurance Group
National Security Fire and Casualty
North Star Mutual Insurance Company
Oklahoma Farm Bureau
Penn America Group, Inc.
Shelter Mutual Insurance Company
State Farm Fire & Casualty
Stonebridge Life Insurance Company
The Hartford
The Republic Group
Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company
United Home Insurance Company


Policyholder’s Rights
Most policyholders are unaware of their rights and entitlements when dealing with their insurance company during the claims process. The majority of states, including Oklahoma, have codified the “Unfair Claims Settlement Practice Act.” The UCSPA identifies those specific acts by an insurer, which if committed, constitute an unfair claim settlement practice. Those actions are as follows:

36 O.S. §1250.5 – Actions that Violate the Unfair Claims Settlement Practice Act

Any of the following acts by an insurer, if committed in violation of Section 1250.3 of this title, constitutes an unfair claim settlement practice:
  1. Failing to fully disclose to first party claimants, benefits, coverages or other provisions of any insurance policy or insurance contract when such benefits, coverages or other provisions are pertinent to a claim;

  2. Knowingly misrepresenting to claimants pertinent facts or policy provisions relating to coverages at issue;

  3. Failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for prompt investigations of claims arising under its insurance policies or insurance contracts;

  4. Not attempting in good faith to effectuate prompt, fair and equitable settlement of claims submitted in which liability has become clear;

  5. Failing to comply with the provisions of Section 1219 of this title;

  6. Denying a claim for failure to exhibit the property without proof of demand and unfounded refusal by a claimant to do so;

  7. Except where there is a time limit specified in the policy, making statements, written or otherwise, which require a claimant to give written notice of loss or proof of loss within a specified time limit and which seek to relieve the company of its obligations if such a time limit is not complied with unless the failure to comply with such time limit prejudices an insurer’s rights;

  8. Requesting a claimant to sign a release that extends beyond the subject matter that gave rise to the claim payment;

  9. Issuing checks or drafts in partial settlement of a loss or claim under a specified coverage which contain language which releases an insurer or its insured from its total liability.

  10. Denying payment to a claimant on the grounds that services, procedures, or supplies provided by a treating physician or hospital were not medically necessary unless the health insurer or administrator, as defined in Section 1442 of this title, first obtains an opinion from any provider of health care licensed by law and preceded by a medical examination or claim review, to the effect that the services, procedures, or supplies for which payment is being denied were not medically necessary. Upon written request of a claimant, treating physician or hospital, such opinion shall be set forth in a written report, prepared and signed by the reviewing physician. The report shall detail with specific services, procedures, or supplies where not medically necessary, in the opinion of the reviewing physician, and an explanation of that conclusion. A copy of each report of a reviewing physician shall be mailed by the health insurer, or administrator, postage prepaid, to the claimant, treating physician or hospital requesting same within fifteen (15) days after receipt of such written request. As used in this paragraph, “physician” means a person holding a valid license to practice medicine and surgery, osteopathic medicine, podiatric medicine, denistry, chiropractic or optometry, pursuant to the state licensing provisions of Title 59 of the Oklahoma Statutes.

  11. Compensating a reviewing physician, as defined in paragraph 10 of this subsection, on the basis of a percentage of the amount by which a claim is reduced for payment;

  12. Violating the provisions of the Health Care Fraud Prevention Act;

  13. Compelling, without just cause, policyholders to institute suits to recover amounts due under its insurance policies or insurance contracts by offering substantially less than the amounts ultimately recovered in suits brought by them, when the policyholders have made claims for amounts reasonably similar to the amounts ultimately recovered;

  14. Failing to maintain a complete record of all complaints which it has received during the preceding three (3) years or since the date of its last financial examination conducted or accepted by the Commissioner, whichever time is longer. This record shall indicate the total number of complaints, their classification by line of insurance, the nature of each complaint, the disposition of each complaint, and the time it took to process each complaint. For the purposes of this paragraph, "complaint" means any written communication primarily expressing a grievance;

  15. Requesting a refund of all or a portion of a payment of a claim made to a claimant or health care provider more than twenty-four (24) months after the payment is made. This paragraph shall not apply:
    1. if the payment was made because of fraud committed by the claimant or health care provider, or

    2. if the claimant or health care provider has otherwise agreed to make a refund to the insurer for overpayment of a claim; or

  16. Failing to pay, or requesting a refund of a payment, for health care services covered under the policy of a health benefit plan, or its agent, has provided a preauthorization or precertification and verification of eligibility for those health care services. This paragraph shall not apply if:
    1. the claim or payment was made because of fraud committed by the claimant or health care provider,

    2. the subscriber had a pre-existing exclusion under the policy related to the service provided, or

    3. the subscriber or employer failed to pay the applicable premium and all grace periods and extensions of coverage have expired.

36 O.S. §1250.6 – Acknowledgment of Receipt of Claim - Provisions for Claim Forms, Instruction, and Reasonable Assistance
  1. Every property and casualty insurer, within thirty (30) days after receiving notification of a claim, shall acknowledge the receipt of such notification unless payment is made within such period of time. If an acknowledgment is made by means other than writing, an appropriate notation of such acknowledgment shall be made in the claim file of the property and casualty insurer, and dated. Notification given to an agent of a property and casualty insurer shall be notification to the insurer.

  2. Every property and casualty insurer, upon receiving notification of a claim, promptly shall provide necessary claim forms, instruction, and reasonable assistance so that first party claimants can comply with the policy conditions and the reasonable requirements of the property and casualty insurer. Compliance with this paragraph within thirty (30) days after notification of a claim shall constitute compliance with subsection A of this section.
36 O.S. §1250.7 – Acceptance or Denial of Claim
  1. Within forty-five (45) days after receipt by a property and casualty insurer of properly executed proofs of loss, the first party claimant shall be advised of the acceptance or denial of the claim by the insurer, or if further investigation is necessary. No property and casualty insurer shall deny a claim because of a specific policy provision, condition, or exclusion unless reference to such provision, condition, or exclusion is included in the denial. A denial shall be given to any claimant in writing, and the claim file of the property and casualty insurer shall contain a copy of the denial. If there is a reasonable basis supported by specific information available for review by the Commissioner that the first party claimant has fraudulently caused or contributed to the loss, a property and casualty insurer shall be relieved from the requirements of this subsection. In the event of a weather-related catastrophe or a major natural disaster, as declared by the Governor, the Insurance Commissioner may extend the deadline imposed under this subsection an additional twenty (20) days.

  2. If a claim is denied for reasons other than those described in subsection A of this section, and is made by any other means than writing, an appropriate notation shall be made in the claim file of the property and casualty insurer until such time as a written confirmation can be made.

  3. Every property and casualty insurer shall complete investigation of a claim within sixty (60) days after notification of proof of loss unless such investigation cannot reasonably be completed within such time. If such investigation cannot be completed, or if a property and casualty insurer needs more time to determine whether a claim should be accepted or denied, it shall so notify the claimant within sixty (60) days after receipt of the proofs of loss, giving reasons why more time is needed. If the investigation remains incomplete, a property and casualty insurer shall, within sixty (60) days from the date of the initial notification, send to such claimant a letter setting forth the reasons additional time is needed for investigation. Except for an investigation of possible fraud or arson which is supported by specific information giving a reasonable basis for the investigation, the time for investigation shall not exceed one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of proof of loss. Provided, in the event of a weather-related catastrophe or a major natural disaster, as declared by the Governor, the Insurance Commissioner may extend this deadline for investigation an additional twenty (20) days.

  4. Insurers shall not fail to settle first party claims on the basis that responsibility for payment should be assumed by others except as may otherwise be provided by policy provisions.

  5. Insurers shall not continue or delay negotiations for settlement of a claim directly with a claimant who is neither an attorney nor represented by an attorney, for a length of time which causes the claimant's rights to be affected by a statute of limitations, or a policy or contract time limit, without giving the claimant written notice that the time limit is expiring and may affect the claimant's rights. Such notice shall be given to first party claimants thirty (30) days, and to third party claimants sixty (60) days, before the date on which such time limit may expire.

  6. No insurer shall make statements which indicate that the rights of a third party claimant may be impaired if a form or release is not completed within a given period of time unless the statement is given for the purpose of notifying a third party claimant of the provision of a statute of limitations.

  7. If a lawsuit on the claim is initiated, the time limits provided for in this section shall not apply.
Read More on the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act.pdf

Market Conduct Examinations
Policyholders may also request from the State Insurance Commissioner what is referred to as Market Conduct Exam. Market Conduct Exams, or MCEs as they are often referred to, are routinely conducted by the Oklahoma Insurance Department of all insurance companies doing business in Oklahoma. The purpose of the examination is to determine compliance by the insurance company with provisions of the law and other facts relative to business methods, management or equity of the company’s dealings with its policyholders. Unacceptable or non-complying practices by an insurance company will routinely be disclosed in the Market Conduct Exam. The following are examples of areas of an insurance company’s operations which are routinely reviewed for compliance:
  • Operations and management;
  • Claim Practices;
  • Sales and Marketing;
  • Licensing;
  • Underwriting and rating practices;
  • Policy and forms adherence; and,
  • Complaint handling.
If you would like to request or view Market Conduct Examinations of your insurance carrier you may contact the Oklahoma Insurance Department at the address referenced below. As MCEs are done only periodically, you may want to request all that were conducted during a several year period in order to ensure you get a thorough picture of your insurance company’s operation, rates, claim handling practices, etc.

John Doak, Insurance Commissioner
Oklahoma Insurance Department
Five Corporate Plaza
3625 NW 56th, Suite 100
Oklahoma City, OK 73112
(405) 521-2828
(800) 522-0071